I’m worried about the future of… this… what I’m doing right now: Sitting at a keyboard and opening sluice gates of my corrupted mind onto an unsuspecting cyberspace public (which may or may not exist outside my ego and desire). I’m worried some asshole will successfully install his dumb-ass dictate that we’d be much better off if laws curbed, tamed, muzzled and denatured this World Wide Web we exploit everyday, bringing into our lives new ideas, fresh approaches, really bad amateur movie reviews and that sweet, sweet blond-on-blond, lick-nipple porn.
Singapore, Russia, the Gulf States, China and even Australia have or are considering restraining rampaging beast of the Internet. We know that since Well-Placed People – academics, cheap politicians, professional muff divers, and mama’s boys – have been opining about “controlling” the Internet, the day could be near when cyberspace censorship is as everyday as campus speech codes, hate-crime laws, and gay divorce. This is nothing new. It’s comparatively new technology, however, that’s being censored – something that wasn’t supposed to happen back when Al Gore’s marvelous invention began spreading its global tendrils.
What’s most ominous are signs of organized crusades to install moral filters on America’s web. From insurance commercials to self-appointed dipshit “occupiers“, the Internet as medium is getting slagged. Remember: Whatever politically correct gods would destroy, they first make ridiculous.
One of the more vapidly original theories is by “digital visionary” (if Salon calls someone “visionary”, their imagination is legally blind) Jaron Lanier, who posits in yet another interview about yet another book of dubious soothsaying (get ready) the Internet destroyed the middle class:
“Here’s a current example of the challenge we face,” he writes in the book’s prelude: “At the height of its power, the photography company Kodak employed more than 140,000 people and was worth $28 billion. They even invented the first digital camera. But today Kodak is bankrupt, and the new face of digital photography has become Instagram. When Instagram was sold to Facebook for a billion dollars in 2012, it employed only 13 people. Where did all those jobs disappear? And what happened to the wealth that all those middle-class jobs created?”
It’s getting earned by sweat-shop workers in China, Jaron, churning out digital cameras, printers and paper for all the homegrown Dorothea Lange’s out there. Your precious globalization did more to destroy America’s middle class than Marx, cable-television tits, or the Internet.
Number one – don’t ever trust a white guy with dreadlocks. Obviously, he has no friends, because if he did, they’d tell him how bust-out slaphappy he looks. This is evidence of “Bob Marley Glom-on Disorder”. BomGlod strikes mostly young, affluent jackasses burdened with the idea that hairdos can strike back at The Man. Obviously Lanier didn’t listen closely to President Obama’s speech last week defending wholesale government groping of our electronic communication. Rough translation is: “I don’t care if you don’t like it. I’m gonna bug your ass, anyway.” For the first time in American history, at national level, an African American is The Man. Obama could actually grow legitimate dreads; despite baggy eyes and middle-age sag, Lanier resembles a 15-year-old wannabe “whigger” whose zero-sum “cool” leads him to deify black thugs. This is as attractive as puke on a dinner table.
Another thing, Salon totes up his bio by alleging Lanier was “raised mostly in Texas and New Mexico by bohemian parents who’d escaped anti-Semitic violence in Europe”. Good God! So… the Holocaust is still ragin’?!This finally must be said: Never have I witnessed any other group of people so forever imperiled, so chronically on edge of destruction’s abyss. It can’t ALL be perfidy of us goys.
(Actually, European storm troopers can be thrown in jail for insulting the Chosen; just ask former haute couture bad boy John Galliano. If a flamboyant homo can be jugged up for “anti-Semitism”, we know who won that “intersectional” battle. All loud put-upon victim classes are equal, but some… you know the rest.)
Lanier’s book is bound to be cited, used as legislation template, and bandied about in hundreds of dull professorial gatherings that don’t come alive until horny wives get liquored up.
This is the chart for most intellectual E-coli dumped on us – torture, dungeons, surveillance, Marism, abandonment of the First Amendment on every fucking campus in this land. Once our auto-acclaimed brain trust considers something a fine idea, its official installation at some point follows. Remember feminists and Satanic Ritual Abuse? It got vetted by man-hating harridans and became real for cops and prosecutors, then individuals’ and families’ lives and fortunes were gutted and hung out to dry. And here’s the sweet part: These theoretical Tamerlanes never face any kind of accounting for their ugly devastation. No one more popularized SRA than feminist and Marxist Beatrix Campbell; today she’s happily employed as journalist and columnist for Britain’s Lefty Guardian newspaper. There’s some payback for you.
You want to know what’s wrong with the internet? Same thing that’s wrong in general with modern life – our mainstream media. It’s pervasive on the web and we needn’t plunk down a dime to read its steadily more-detached gibber. Paradoxically, the web also has corroded power of the media – and even sent many newspapers to existential Davy Jones Locker. There is no sharper two-edged sword for our information industry to collapse on.
Here’s what the formula looks like. Take a story like a story like the $57 million fraud that drained reparation funds from the Holocaust Claims Conference – the agency tasked with dispensing a never-ending stream of restitution money mostly from maximally remorseful Germany for 61 years now(!). When phony applications for the dough were discovered three years ago, it got cursory coverage in the mainstream media. Now that ringleader Semyon Domnitser and others have been convicted of the scam, questions have been raised why the Conference didn’t investigate at the time suspicions were first raised over a decade ago. This has prompted an internecine battle in the reparations industry (it can only be called that; it’s older than the personal computer industry, after all) over who knew what, whether the leadership panel should resign, who has holiest pronouncement privilege, and so on.
These developments aren’t ticking geiger counters at our major news organizations, apparently. Try to find stories about them in news sites other than those with primarily Jewish readership. As we know from the Anti-Defamation League, it’s “canard” to note heavy Jewish involvement in mainstream Western media. (A “canard” in this case is synonymous with “elephant in the room” – a commonly known fact no one dares mention, and about which we must believe agenda-driven counter-reality.) Most major media giants like Viacom and Disney/ABC/ESPN are solidly in Hebrew hands, but calling attention to that fact – especially if one is an Unchosen – can be fatal to career and earning power. Just ask John Sanchez.
We can access information on twists and turns of this rather sad all-in-the-family non-spectacle. …If we want. Hope they get their money back. I guess. Sixty-one years, and billions of dollars later, this is the endless murder penalty that keeps on giving; for an original $1.3 billion bill, Germany has doled out $89 billion to survivors of Nazi crimes. Surely, Hitler’s victims could never imagine such a cash cow fed on their suffering.
I suppose that embarrassing facts never completely go away once they enter cyberspace is major point of irritation for those ultra-sensitive to embarrassment (who almost always are those with most to be embarrassed about). That’s why we’re stuck with a bill to end anonymous internet posting, and the like. Campaigns to cork this communication miracle usually are couched in community-salvation drives, like ending “cyber-bullying”, and, by rote, savin’ the fuckin’ children. Britain already has started chopping weeds in the web.
There are those in the West already enamored with the Chinese Model of Development which entails blowing up a huge real-estate bubble by building entire cities – CITIES – in which no one can afford to live! Talk about a bubble waiting to explode. When it does, better duck. Fortunately for the regime, however, nobody can openly engage this ticking time bomb, since Internet in the Land of Nine Domains is gagged with “filters”.
That will be the kind of vehicle on which our own brand of internet censorship will arrive. Bad news is bad business, I guess. The Chinese think so.