Frankness is social casualty in the West

noiniidThe Washington Post cheerily shares with us a map showing the world’s most ‘tolerant’ countries. We now know that in the Third World, nobody cares about getting tagged ‘racist’ – while here in the West it’s practically capital crime. There, they’re honest simply because they can be; here, not so much.

This country comes out amazingly well, so we know no one from American media and higher learning had final say on tabulating results: Every hanging chad would be evidence of redneck perfidy, every wrinkled ballot a thought crime.

It’s horrible, I know, to bring this up. Maybe in a few years my mind can be scoured of such heresy, and I can take my place at the campfire, makin’ ‘Smores, singing from the Partisan Songbook, and yearning for the day when we all join hands and cou…nt the birdies up high in bahnahnah tree. Until then, it occurs to me obsession about social impact of racism corresponds directly to income bracket; the more affluent one is, and the more distant from the country’s day-to-day reality, the more one tends to believe it’s rampant and a defining social component. Racism today is as or even more important as political impetus – with ‘anti-racism’ driving projects that have little or nothing to do with race. Also, accusation of racism is used as censor and threat, since its brand is still so repellent and fearsome.

And it just may be that…

  • Respondents to this survey may be just plain ol’, sorry-ass lying about who they’d prefer next door. The story notes this, but it considers chances of this minor. I don’t.
  • Most neighborhoods in America resemble mine, with surprisingly placid mix of Mexican, honky, black, Armenian, and a sprinkling of Jews who can’t afford Sherman Oaks – so the point is moot. That’s the Valley, though. And that’s economic strata I occupy. Peace and friendliness are necessary tools for geographic co-existence; it’s simply easier, more pleasant and a lot less noisy not to be a prick.
  • Standards for ‘racism’ are different than how we peasants might define them, and stringent standards are established by people who probably live in some of the least-diverse neighborhoods this side of Iceland. ‘Racism’ as concept relies on exacting assessment and strategic perfectionism – rarely attributes of the toiling class.
  • Poorer and more populous a country, less trusting the denizens for reasons of the their own, and so group identity is a necessary port in stormy civic transaction. I can’t judge citizens of Karachi because I don’t live their reality.

Frankly, other than gas-bagging here, I don’t have a lot of time to sweat whether my soul is stained with such infamy. It would cut into my drinking time.

Leave a Comment

Filed under DysInTerraFirma

Another sideshow for demented media

nancoHLN Medusa has last word

A couple of days ago, reading news spam on the Trayvon Martin case finally coming to trial, a jock on Radio 980 down here couldn’t remember the first name of the Florida teenager’s accused killer, finally settling on ‘Mark’. His offhand, couldn’t-care-less demeanor earned him a tongue-lashing from higher-ups, I’ll bet. …For we all know the Trayvon Martin shooting reveals America’s soul and all ugliness therein. And that’s no laughing matter unless the ‘right’ people laugh.

Or, it was just another of thousands-per-year street shootings in this country, and our perception has been warped by media’s initial misidentification of George Zimmerman as a good ol’ boy racist night rider.

…With a Peruvian mother.

Once all the details were aired, you could practically hear gas hiss from the sanctimony bag. Seems Martin was beating him up – and Zimmerman shot him. He shouldn’t have followed the teen in the first place, much less pack a gun, but Zimmerman’s history reveals tendency to choose the least-intelligent course of action at the most unfortunate of times. It’s impossible (for me, at least) to see this as yet another martyr stand at Edmund Pettus Bridge.

The big news, though, is that CNN’s ugly bastard Headline News will bring its cameras into the Florida courtroom, providing gavel-to-gavel coverage for whoever still might be interested in this period on a aside in a footnote to an insignificance. And that means everyone’s favorite harridan, Nancy Grace, will have inside track to feed her prime-time hysterics. Prospect this intellectual hog chase could linger past Labor Day and into fall’s holiday season is too excruciating to contemplate.

Grace is best as insane ringmaster on her lynch-mob of a show, howling invective at both accused, victim and her own sidekicks, alike. Although as legal analyst she comes up a mite short, this ex-prosecutor does, however, fit the new media model: Fuck fair consideration of the facts and go for pure, war-hoop emotion. Her viewership is Banshee Nation, relying on heart and gut. Intellect can go stuff its pointy head up its geek ass.

Here’s the record, however:

;npo;nolkGrace was one of a majority of media types who jumped all over the Duke Lacrosse team members accused of raping a black stripper seven years ago. Broiling in either high-femme or low-fraud outrage, she sneered,  insulted and condemned the young men before the case fell apart upon discovery “there was no crime”, as the state’s attorney general put it. When D.A. Mike Nifong announced there was no DNA evidence to back up his assertions in December 2006 and a few months later, when the North Carolina AG squashed the case, Grace took the night off. Class, Nancy. Class.

;npo;nolkHer coverage of Amanda Knox’s murder trial in Italy was pitched, of course, against Knox. There were times it felt like Grace wanted to pull the gallows lever on the young student herself. Why? Was it because Knox is beautiful, Nancy, and you’re an almost shockingly repulsive pig? There’s no evidence against Knox, Nancy. None. Can’t you look up from your case lots of Martha Stewart Chocolate Eclairs long enough to comprehend that? Have you lost control of yourself? How many of your old cases should we be sifting for indication you ramrodded innocents to prison terms – or worse? Are there real skeletons in your closet, you crazy hag? …Men and women you pushed into execution chambers and then howled with laughter at their death spasms?

;npo;nolkAfter the kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart years ago, you hounded an innocent handyman at her family home, drawing your circle of guilt around him based on nothing more than his old rap sheet and your obscene confidence in insight as nonexistent as your incompetence is fresh and reeking. You’re not really cut out for the job you did for years, Grace – either in the courtroom or on TV. You’re more suited to wiping shit spatters off chimp-cage walls. Know what, Nan? Let it go. I have far too much respect for primates who perhaps can’t talk, but probably have a term for you: Improvised Explosive Shrike.

Americans have parted company with their media. One factor impelling this is, of course, the Internet. We simply have more information to peruse in order to arrive at conclusions citizens in democracies need to govern themselves. That we haven’t yet broken down to failed-state status or even civil war is testament to our own, fairly accurate perceptions of reality.

…And the fact that we think our media is full of shit.

I suspect why we’re hearing such drumbeat about how the I-net is destructive, how it can’t be trusted, why it must be controlled. It’s the brat too-frequently noticing the our pompous emperors are stark naked and shriveled of ball sac. It must be constrained in SOME manner, or we coolies will ignore all the for-profit blather and American publishing will go the way of blacksmiths and communes.

Mainstream, fat-head, hosted-bar, suck-the-bigshot-dick media senses its sun has all but set. It won’t disappear, but its ordeal as public joke will become more savage and inescapable. Conglomerate owners and publishers sunning in the Aegean have saddled their lackies with office of public pontiff, soiled vestal virgin of our public religion; this sect’s relentlessly ignored and now frequently ridiculed precepts once were derided as political correctness and now are despised utterly by those of us who must live in the shit and routine horror of the real world made shittier and more oppressively routine by thought-crime purges.

Here in the Southland, we’ve got another “racist vandalism” outrage on our hands. Or, rather, on their hands – the “information industry” – absolutely convinced they can puff this inconsequential tagging as proof of race war for which they’ve been slavering, that key indication all they’ve been telling us is true. …That we’re besieged by hate and whatever. Meanwhile, our sick wars continue (which the media pit-crewed); our dollar buys and we earn less and less; the economy tubs without talking heads seeing it coming and they blame us vicious, cheesy home-buyers. L.A. schools are full of molesters they never knew were there. They’re on the side of immigrant tidal wave about 75 percent of us 99ers are against. We didn’t get healthcare reform, or financial re-regulation and every month there’s a new food-poisoning outbreak because they believed our “leaders” when they said it was good to have government off our backs except when they’re suspending our due process – as they almost did with the still-body-temperature kettle bomber – and maybe dropping us in Gitmo with a handful of fellow citizens.

Parents are up in arms, blaming local law enforcement for not notifying them of an earlier incident at Agoura High School. Since this will turn out to be a juvenile prank or “hate-crime” hoax, the Sheriff’s Department handled it the right way. The real story here is why we’re constantly urged by an almost hysterical media to consider these non-events major “hate crimes”, phony confirmation that armies of racist killers are prowling the countryside, looking for chronic victims to lynch. It would help prove assertion that there’s real peril in our midst if one of these imaginary atrocities actually OCCURRED. Sprayed words don’t cut it because anyone can can squirt paint from a can, and despite our urban-legend folk wisdom, mere words neither harm us nor indicate real and present danger. This will be yet another payday for the Anti-Hate Industry as expense in patience for the rest of us.

Couldn’t we have a short-list of what ISN’T racist to our nervous-nellie media? “Racism” is a term so overused, so ambiguously defined, it’s become a term as stupid and overused as “reaching out”. I’ve reached out to my friends and told them if I ever say “reaching out” they should kill me like a suffering animal. It joins ‘shit’ and ‘super’ as words that can mean anything.

We’ve moved on, fearless anti-hate champions. We had to. If we paid attention everytime you reached out to tell us we’re execrable supremacists, we’d be as stupidly corrupt and useless as you are. There’s only so much nonsense in the bag – then it’s gone. And I think if there’s too much stupid in the world we’ll regress to earlier mammalian form; prairie dog, perhaps, although they’re pretty smart. We should be winnowing the dummy herd, not nourishing it.

It’s not that we’re ‘uncomfortable’ or fearful talking about race. It’s that we never get to talk about it; we’re talked TO about it. There’s a narrative: Everything wrong in black America is white America’s fault. That narrative hasn’t changed in half a century. It’s stagnated, unamended by anything like present reality. It’s shoved down our throats, and we prove ourselves racist to question it.

OK – time for some racism. We need to look at flaws in black culture as possible impetus for perennial poverty and social catastrophe of much of that demographic. Maybe – as horrible as this sounds – it’s time to hear white Americans’ appraisal of the circumstance, at least for variety, if nothing else.

We know the old, old story by rote. And, again, nothing changes; it’s still all about Jim Crow, racism and lynching. On no other issue are we so trapped in the past. We cannot solve present dilemmas when we live in the long-ago.

Let’s update. This will take courage. For whites, we must lose our fear of the racism accusation; black people will have to look at their culture honestly, warts and all.

We can be sure of one thing: This will not happen in our lifetimes.

Meanwhile, the Trayvon Martin case finally comes to trial. This is another “oh, look at the honky monster and soak him in your righteous contempt” media confection. It matters to some demographics and to us whiteys not at all. We see a street shooting, local tragedy, again inflated to major scenic turnout and restroom on Freedom Way. But we don’t feel the vibes. We don’t suffer guilt – and that’s fresh. More and more, America’s Hispanic population is picking up on the story, but not the way the media had in mind. Some are beginning to see Zimmerman, who’s half Hispanic, as victim. (If he cured cancer, the media surely would tag him as brown; since he shot a black teenager, though, he be confirmed white.)

So, it’s fitting Grace has the case. If thumb puppets can seethe with molten, ambiguously provoked fury, Nancy Grace is real. But we’re adults, and we know she’s just a profoundly sociopathic monster in a child’s closet called TV.

Leave a Comment

Filed under CircoMinimo

Here comes our media ‘cover’ for IRS

anonoihno

The Atlantic draws connecting dots between a lone nut who flew a plane into a Texas IRS building and the taxman’s probe of Rightwing ‘Tea Party’ groups which began at about the same time three years ago. The article uneasily makes the case that perhaps the reaction was justified.

And perhaps it was in the hive-mind of a government that manages to spy on newswire services, launch unprovoked war and suspend the Constitution to the point American citizens can be denied due process and dungeonized offshore.

So… This is the emerging cover story? …That idiosyncratically off-kilter Andrew Joseph Stack  unconnected to the Tea Party prompted the IRS to begin investigating Rightwing groups? …That the government was so fearful of hayseed revolution – jerkwater terrorism – that it began a harassment/investigation of these “types”? If Stack was to be archetype to down-home radical, a better one couldn’t be found: He obvious was against the status quo and no matter how much they consider themselves otherwise, our elites epitomize and populate our new, repressive establishment; his crime was reminiscent in miniature of 9/11; and he suggests our soured underclass out there, exiled from attention and lost in the cornfields, are suicidally committed to whatever crypto-fascist objectives our knee-jerk media can pin on them.

Surely, the government was prepared for rural rebellion. A year before the Department of Homeland Security had ‘profiled’ terror du jour as coming from the homeland itself. In a move that both blunted charges of racism in targeting Muslims as potential threats and justified crackdowns on the Right, the paper proposed new terrorists would be white, possibly bitter over destitution wrought by the 2008 meltdown, political extremists, losers. It lumped together Gulf War vets and anti-government protesters with racist ‘militants’ and those seldom-active beer-keg battalions of backwoods militiamen.

And the American media, always ready to take a progressive, state-of-the-art, anti-racist (of course) stand, chimed in with its useful if empty innuendo and slander. The Atlantic notes, in a rare moment of coherence:

There was a big David Barstow piece in the New York Times on Feb. 12, 2010, examining the political aspirations of Tea Party and other groups: “Tea Party Lights Fuse for Rebellion on Right.” Within the first five paragraphs, it mentions the Tea Party, the Sandpoint Tea Party Patriots, Friends for Liberty, Glenn Beck’s 9/12 Project, the John Birch Society, and Oath Keepers, described as “a new player in a resurgent militia movement.” As the Times described it:

The Tea Party movement has become a platform for conservative populist discontent, a force in Republican politics for revival, as it was in the Massachusetts Senate election, or for division. But it is also about the profound private transformation of people like Mrs. Stout, people who not long ago were not especially interested in politics, yet now say they are bracing for tyranny…

Urged on by conservative commentators, waves of newly minted activists are turning to once-obscure books and Web sites and discovering a set of ideas long dismissed as the preserve of conspiracy theorists, interviews conducted across the country over several months show. In this view, Mr. Obama and many of his predecessors (including George W. Bush) have deliberately undermined the Constitution and free enterprise for the benefit of a shadowy international network of wealthy elites.

As figurehead of mom and pop pissed-off frustration, maybe it’s reasonable the Tea Party fell under clouds of suspicion. But then… it’s more than mere suspicion we’re talking about. It’s actual intimidation tactics and procedural surveillance the IRS could and did wield.

And that bit about believing the last few administrations have “undermined the Constitution and free enterprise for the benefit of a shadowy international network of wealthy elites” doesn’t strike me quite as pathetically amusing as does the Times. Tell me once in the past 15 years when government has done anything to benefit the domestic American working-class at expense of these “international elites”. In one word, “globalization”, we have proof-positive the transaction works the other way around, and Americans earning below six figures don’t wedge their pie charts to any degree.

Not many folk remember this, but the Tea Party began in late 2008 as roiling, chaotic protest against President Bush’s bailouts of those now-iconic Banks Too Big To Fail. For a brief moment, there was emergence of genuine, populist revolt out here.

Nothing could more terrify our sniffy elites. So, the Lefty media began wishboning them as yokel racists and the Right co-opting them as health-industry gofers, stooges to help harpoon Obama’s healthcare “reforms”. Remember – at that time, for another microsecond – those reforms included at least skeletal suggestion of socialized medicine in form of government-underwritten “single payer” health cost coverage. The Obama administration threw that away even before the debate began.

Remember?

What began as citizen protest, legitimate outrage at our corrupt, crap-game banking and investment structure was demonized and hijacked out of legitimate existence. But now we know just how deep the sabotage ran.

Odd that when the “Occupy” movement arose a year and a half later, it was lionized subtly, though ultimately derided into obscurity. It was perceived as Lefty, so it wasn’t demonized as was the Tea Party. Being from that politic, Occupy never was perceived as “dangerous” populist – meaning “genuine populist”. This movement was young, untested, confused as it was confusing, socialist insofar as its original nemesis was declared to be the financial industry, and from the “right” population – white, affluent and well-educated. In short, it was everything that failed 40 years ago, but still has coin – mysteriously – in media and academia. As Occupy’s targets multiplied into micro-bits, and it announced itself opposition to every component of American life, it reduced itself to idiotic metaphor and quickly disappeared, another victim of spoiled-child overreach. When will a political movement emerge that uninterested in “changing the world”? …One that doesn’t mistake stupidity for commitment?

Let’s let the IRS roast on its own spit. We don’t owe this government shit, Democrat or Republican. And the next time a populist moment comes along, let’s not stupid it out from under us.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Mission: Imperilous

All dressed up and still headed down

pipoThe cheap-seat ads in right-hand gutter of the FaceBook page are never-ending trove of eye-gruel treasure. Today, I’ve raided them to come up with a new logo for phony crap shoved down our throats. It’s here at right, ready to start steppin’ in the deep stuff. Inaugural slag is Chuck Schumer, personification of profit-minded bleeding heart. Today, his legacy project immigration “reform” has been caught up in a PC Tit-Wringer – that tragically hilarious phenomenon in which sanctimonious ’causes’ butt up against each other in mad tangle for moral high ground.

I'm lying, but only this much: Nuland

I’m lying, but only this much: Nuland

New York Congresswoman Grace Meng has pointed out that current provisions, “would limit family reunifications by effectively eliminating the ability of U.S. citizens to sponsor their adult siblings and married adult children for permanent residency,” according to news reports. This dire handicap to anchor-family front-loading would affect Asian immigrants in particular. Evidently.

Hearing the dinner bell usually brings all hands to jump in the feed.

Whatever will Chuck do? We can be sure it will land on the side of our highest social tiers. His financial “reform” a couple of years ago answered the call of banks and investment honchos in New York; instead of reinstalling crucial regulations and firewalls like unwisely abandoned Glass-Steagall, which separated commercial and investment banking, his package instead prohibited our financial industry from issuing S&H Green Stamps. If the coolies want a new blender, they’ll have to shell out full price – not depend on their patience licking glue. So THERE!

Good news: Anytime anyone starts talking “legacy”, they see sunset of their careers. End to Schumer’s hypocritical oeuvre couldn’t arrive too soon.

Close runner-up for this week’s pimp-out is some in the liberal cybersphere concocting a conspiracy theory of their own concerning non-issue of who knew what when in the Benghazi attack last year. Evidently, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, a target already for the Right (simply because she works in a Demo administration and leaves vapor on any mirror held under her nose), Nuland has interesting connections to that combative side of the aisle.

Victoria Nuland’s role as spokesperson for the State Department, deemed strange by some who remember her tenure as principal deputy national security adviser to then Vice President Dick Cheney, has become stranger yet.

Her husband, Robert Kagan, has joined Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign as a foreign policy adviser. Kagan, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, also advised the McCain campaign in 2008.

Muckety finds it odd – VERY odd – that such a deep-sunk post in the Democratic fence line would have pillow-talk privileges with a neconservative warmonger the likes of Kagan. Well, in truth, they never bring up Kagan’s neocon curriculum vitae, including pressing the Iraq invasion while operative at the execrable Project for the American Century. But I do.

Nuland’s name has popped up in State Department emails urging references to al Qaeda and terrorists be dropped from official communiques. Clinton’s department, on info from the CIA, maintained Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in a spontaneous riot stirred up by what may be the worst video ever made to still go viral.

The Left huffs portentously that perhaps this Rightwing mole deliberately sabotaged Clinton’s department – and thereby her chances for the White House in 2016. Naturally, as in most conspiracy theories, there’s not a flyspeck of evidence to back up the spurious claims.

I think State was victim of its own group-think – and of Washington’s tendency to believe self-composed literary narrative over evident reality. We have powerful, rich people who arrogantly believe the discernible real world – and all its ‘facts on the ground’ as Israelis call inarguable if inconvenient truth – is whatever they say it is, since they have virtually Godlike power of control over Everything.

The Obama Administration and its wide-ranging Clinton State Department helped to power specious “insurgents” now impersonating Libya’s filmy “government”. That was a somewhat controversial decision impacting our moves now in Syria; the Syrian rebels appear every bit as savage and yankee-hating (while getting our support) as those who blew off Qaddafy’s head two years ago. Ergo, these ragtag bandits and fanatical Islamists just couldn’t be behind this horrid massacre of our personnel and burning of the embassy.

…Just because we say so.

Now the thing is blowing up in their faces. Go figure.

Benghazi is one of those non-issues no one but Washington hacks give a shit about. The Right thinks they can kettle bomb Clinton’s chances in three years to emerge from near-miss in 2008 finally to the Presidency, and be the first Chief Executive for whom “douche bag” is more than a slur she flings at L.A. metrosexuals.

The real scandals put AG Eric Holder on the griddle. He survived those arms sales to drug cartels two years ago – but will he get past his department’s snooping on Associated Press newsmen with his job? And how about IRS’ “auditgate” scandal over conservative-group tax-targeting? How will that probe shake out?

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Politicum

All our villains, good, bad and so-so

villossIt’s disheartening to read FaceBook these days. Over the years, most of the people I’ve met and like, most of the people I’ve kept as friends, have been the kind of Lefty-liberal I used to be. It’s distressing to see them constantly bash Republicans, or conservatives, or some mythical, blobby “Right” – not so much because I’m no longer in their political camp (although there’s that), but because I don’t think our political arrangement can be described anymore in “Left or Right” terms.

Our new elite owns both, so it’s really foolish to constantly bash some mindset that’s simply another subsidiary of that bloc which owns mine. We still have fools – plenty of them – who stubbornly think of themselves as Left or Right, but without means to empower these vague worldviews above coffee-house gas-bagging, that personal appraisal is meaningless.

One of the characteristics of our phony culture, though, is delusion of great difference in political poles based on ‘culture wars”. This “opposition” of forces  chips away in sideline approach to social mechanics. One side is for legalized abortion, the other against. One supports gun control, the other not. One is for immigration “reform” signifying itself widely as everything from open borders/universal citizenship to at least increased immigration with amnesty for everyone without papers already here. The other side thinks that amid a financial recession that’s stagnated our level of America for going on five years, with more and more jobs being shipped overseas, filling the country with even more employables is either stupid or devious. (I fall into that latter group, and I sniff ‘profit’ fueling ‘devious’ in the ugly scheme.)

“Pro-immigration”, which is really “pro-illegal immigration” advocates never really explain why they think it’s a good idea to flood the country with job competitors for our domestic worker bees. But then, those laboring in payday trenches are too burdened with still-faltering economics at home and abroad to offer energetic opposition. The Left pushes counter-intuitive programs like this the way pit-bull packs dog a jogger; they hector and threaten, advancing proposals that the rest of us will walk in, endure and sicken of while they dream up more social-engineering nightmares from safe, usually well-appointed distance. Once, their brainstorms were impelled by gassy ideology promising Utopian peace and freedom, a gentle pasture where Neapolitan ice cream people would make love not war – except on throwback racists and their uniformly pale fellow travelers.

And that’s why crusaders needn’t preach social nirvana or even guilt-trips about providing diminished middle-class sanctuary for the world’s wretched and poor, yearning to breathe free, as Emma Lazarus would have it. Terms like racism and ‘hate’ simply are employed to stifle crucial discussion. Opponents of open borders simply hate and fear the marvelous vitality and (get ready) vibrance of those wanting in-country by any means necessary, fresh and unassimilated and so establishing on northern soil their mostly backward, poverty-stricken and profoundly corrupt social mechanisms. Almost from the moment they set foot over the line, they’re urged, like their fellow (sometimes enemy) non-whites, to spit on anything white-bread, including, undoubtedly, white bread.

Once terms like ‘racism’, or any of the other endless ‘-isms’,  end debate before it begins, since by hocus-pocus of phony outrage and media humbug, white superiority is akin to rape and murder of Bambi-loving children on criminal-horror scale. Working-class Americans, particularly manual laborers, have real-world concerns about, say, all-but unrestricted immigration providing low-cost labor pool and competition for scarce jobs. Accusation of racism generally is made by social tiers that have little fear from such economic transaction – and many times profit from it. It can intimidate and silence, often deliberately.

As I’ve ranted before, I’m not concerned with making the world a better place. I don’t pretend to know how to do that. Selling anything on basis of “changing the world” sets off my wino in the windshield detector; I know there’s something ghastly stashed behind the persuasion and usually it’s rather blunt and seedy  agenda that will benefit few at expense of many. My ego isn’t inflated to the degree I believe my ideas can change the way human beings have been wired for millennia. To sport these delusions, I would need to spring from social strata in which inflated personal self-appraisal is more important than experience, vision is connected to reality at intervals infrequent and tenuous. Luxury buys time and time distends imagination from reality a thousand times speed of light.

Heritage Foundation numbers cruncher Jason Richwine found out how rabid are keepers of the anti-racist (pro-immigration division) cult when a naive porkchop is thrown them. He quit yesterday after a 166-page report he co-authored about astronomical immigration costs was backtracked by our thought-crime investigators; in this country, at this time, negative immigration news isn’t tolerated. Numbers in the study cannot be debunked, since they’re unfortunately real-world and, so, damnably true, but without missing a beat the hate police went after Richwine himself… personally. Up popped his Harvard dissertation asserting durable, not easily upgraded deficit in Hispanic IQ compared with that of whites. Here’s new line of civic inquiry: If someone makes an inarguable point, forget about the point and go after that someone with all claws bared – real scientific discussion and interchange be damned.

Backing up both papers with assiduously assembled data didn’t help: Once touched off, napalm of yappy, diva-prone howling burns itself out only when there’s nothing left to scorch. From the Leftysphere to MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” (won’t those gas-bags ever stop shouting over each other?) auto-pilot revulsion usually went, “they said the same thing about Irish, Italians, Poles, blah-blah, when they first arrived”.

Actually, Richwine’s results are facts, since intelligence-quotient tests can measure only educational exposure in method least partly dependent on English-language skills. Most of our biped imports from across the border have little or no formal education, some are illiterate, and most are  in deep water where English is concerned. Yes. The marks are low; there’s absolutely no reason they wouldn’t be under the circumstances.

Golly jeepers! Hope this isn’t a Hatepoint – but what exactly IS “economic growth from immigration” in this case? Most undocumented aren’t coming here to become miners and factory hands? Those jobs are mostly overseas now, manned by labor in even worse predicament. Here, they are drawers of water and hewers of wood. Obviously our affluent save a lot of money hiring them as domestics and unskilled workers willing to sweat long hours for box-top wages. But where are fresh capital and development from our “vibrant” new pseudo-citizens? If IQ tests rely more on education than native smarts, then poorly educated arrivals’ scores will reflect that; it’s one of those 1+1 conundrums. This isn’t about racial inferiority. Cheap-labor fans and ethnic boosters have made this a “racism” issue simply to shut the study down and Richwine up.

Biggest problem with Richwine’s soul is the study, not the older dissertation. Impetus for all the bathos and podium hammering, I think, is its projection that the bustling, colorful population here to add zest and sometimes dicey verve to our boring white lives eventually will cost mostly us taxpayers $6.3 trillion in health access, educational budgets, crime, and dearth of taxes paid while illegal, sparsity of it when fully yanqui but toiling at stoop-level pay. Since that figure is not trumpeted, if mentioned at all, in our bienvenidos, amigos media is clear indication our elites don’t want our tepid enthusiasm for the racket to wilt even further. This still is a democracy – with votes and winners/losers, oh, don’t ‘cha know. Must keep us rubes lost in the cornfield or we’ll start getting more pissed that we are.

Better this tale be one of triumph over another closet Klansman, rather than inconvenient fact about open-borders insanity. The study will be allowed to fade into memory. Richwine should be so lucky.

Funny, but transformation to Estados Unidos drained pelf from our elites, as well, including those mandarins of phony morality, the mainstream media. Right here, the L.A. Times is on the block because current publisher-editors can’t figure out that the rag’s readership mostly is white people – so it trumpets phony crap like an Orange County black family besieged by racists no one else has ever seen and a “Raghead Beware” nativist murder last year that turned out to be Muslim “honor killing” by a family member. Big dollops of guilt will keep those coins rattlin’ in news racks – or not, as this particular race-card casino has discovered to its woe: The horrible Alpha-Capitalists, Koch bros, are angling to provide Southland its exhaustively printed word. News they were among the Times’ prospective buyers sent feigned shockwave through our bored Left-o-sphere. Prediction: Even if the Kochs take hold, that Bad Whitey thermometer will still be up our ass, checking for random heat of hate.

American media isn’t just lickspittle and lame. It’s tragically stupid, as well. …And headed the way of the dodo bird, VHS tape, and good manners. Schadenfreude, make my bed.

This week, the circus was ready to coronate this week’s Cleveland slave-shack Django hero of the world. But right after Charles Ramsey kicked door of rescue, he stepped on a a fatal third rail. He’s been wishboned even though African-American for telling newsmen, “”I knew something was wrong when a little pretty white girl ran into a black man’s arms. Something is wrong here. Dead giveaway!” We now know from incidents like firing of Juan Williams (supposedly insulting Arabs) and Shaq O’Neal (Asians) blacks cannot themselves make racial slurs against other dramatically if not factually put-upon non-whites, unless they target themselves with the n-word, which supposedly gives us perpetually racist honkies seething bee-jeebers by employing a term we made up and only they can voice.

(Blacks can, however, freely malign white Gentiles, as did Chris Rock by paraphrasing Williams’ (not-even faintly) anti-Muslim bete noir, saying he didn’t like being around white people; if anything, Rock was lionized for the observation. Williams himself piped up on a CNN show in the mid-’90s that, “You have angry white men here, sort of in their natural state, and you know, gone berserk.” He amplified this meme a few times since; apparently, he believes it’s time white guys stopped blowing one another’s brains off in our urban streets, selling drugs and killing at random in neighborhood enforcement by terror.)

Before long, newsroom cannibals were readying his pot. We now know, as if it makes a difference, that Ramsey has criminal history including beating up women himself. The guy who merely kicked in a door and freed three women kept captive and tormented as long as a decade now has been revealed as (gasp!) human.

Media, fuck yourselves: If we waited for saints to ride to the rescue, those women would’ve died of old age in that hellhole.

Leave the guy alone. And McDonalds: You dump him and it’s Burger King for me from now on.

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under DysInTerraFirma