Chastened? Not quite.
A few days ago, I repeated a report in cyberspace that the New York Times published home address of Darren Wilson, this year’s poster boy for rabid vigilante pale males. This was on the same day as Wilson was exonerated by a Missouri grand jury for shooting a young African American last summer. That shooting in Ferguson has become foundational outrage to spike a “new civil rights movement” hopefully ending… Racist killings. Racist police killings. Police brutality against minorities. Throw in inability of our racist culture to extend asshole rights to 6’4″, 300-pound gentle chocolate bears who want to manhandle diminutive store clerks over a $50 shoplifting beef.
…The usual bullshit.
White people, as we know, have unique privilege to employ looting – what Steve Sailer calls “undocumented shopping” (or, in CIA terminology, ‘enhanced acquisition’). We have the right to assault a police officer, try to take his weapon, ignore his orders to surrender, and then aggressively charge him. We honkies pull that shit all the time and get lollypops and maternal hugs for our trouble.
BLACK PEOPLE GET SHOT!!!!!
That screeching injustice has provoked weeks of retail-intensive “demonstrations” lovingly reported by our media, consisting of dozens or sometimes hundreds of demonstrators marching and occasionally vandalizing and looting American cities to 1.) right this wrong, and 2.) put an end to whitey privilege that allows this and many, many other outrages to continue.
In other words, these “street actions” have given temporary reprieve to the fading “Occupy” movement, allowing its committed, soulful cadres a few more months of scruffy, Che-informed hijinks before looking for jobs and moving out of their parents houses. Wonder why so many recent protests are so populated with white people? Now you know.
But… As it turns out, the Times was victim itself of Rightwing malice. It never actually published Wilson’s address. It referenced a home owned by Wilson and his new wife on Manda Lane in nearby (and much more pacific) Crestwood, Mo. …Never mentioned the street address – just the street. And it noted then neighbors believed the Wilsons had vacated the place.
They had to, turns out, since The Washington Post, The Boston Globe and other news sites had published at least the same basic information back in August. Worst offender was CNN, which ran a picture of the home showing street address posted.
It’s become something of a rallying point among progressives to rebut the Times slander. Repeatedly, point is made that the “newspaper of record” wouldn’t stoop to such irresponsibility. They just told us the street on which he lived. And this after the horrid cop and his shiksa wife had abandoned the shack (wisely fearing for their lives should our excitable social-justice warriors seek undocumented justice against them).
It’s a valid defense, albeit a disingenuous one: Manda Lane is only about 600 yards long. How hard could it be to find the officer’s house? Me? I’d wrap a box like a package, put on an official-looking uniform shirt and knock on doors saying I had a shipment for the Wilsons; I’d do that until some Manda Lane denizen pointed me to the right location.
So… Having repeated an inaccuacy (not quite a falsehood, though), I’m as guilty as Rolling Stone, Lena Dunham, and that poor New York Magazine fool who fell for the shaggy-dog story about an investment-whiz teen-ager worth an imaginary eight figures (!). ($72 million trading between lunch and study hall – wadda example of enterprising immigrants in a land of lazy, good-for-nothing nativists.)
However, question remains: Why would our national-level information industry put anyone in such potential danger? Where is sense of responsibility? Where is common decency or humanity?
What could they possibly be thinking?
WHAT is their motivation?!
Well… We have to remember that our media – that shit-stained piece of lying garbage we’re stuck with – is owned by very rich, very detached people. They don’t know us, they don’t identify with us, and just like every similar social formula in history, they have nothing but contempt for us.
From day-one, the Ferguson carnival was prompted and stage-managed by media – obviously with approval of its fatcat owner class. Why?
It’s important to note that after announcement was made that the Ferguson officer wouldn’t be indicted, riots tore through the town. Buildings were burned, people were hurt. If this had been so extreme on a national level, certainly there would be demands for action on federal-level. Extent of disturbances would key extent of corrective measures. …It always has, particularly after riots of the ’60s.
Had a “race war” broken out, surely emergency actions would be taken. In a worse-case scenario, martial law could be declared. This could entail suspension of civil liberties, application of censorship (temporary, “of course”), detention of rioters or even suspected troublemakers, and, off the deep end, drum-head trials and executions. At bottom-level, the Constitution would be suspended.
As noted, severity of emergency would determine depth of response – and that’s a key point to remember. Such events could spell at least momentary cessation of America’s charter – in effect put the nation in down-time. Conjecture, sure, but this may play at least a part in media’s frenzied rabble-rousing whenever these “adaptions” of real incidents play out.
Crisis, as Rahm Emmanuel once pointed out, is opportunity. This is the way our “leadership” class thinks. …Worse is better. What more efficient way exists to get rid of niggling trifles like due process, free speech and assembly (and free press, though out Pravda hive-mind hacks would hardly notice)?
What better way to end the American experiment in one fell swoop?
Yes. It’s paranoid. But we live in genuinely paranoid times.
As I noted five years ago, when the Justice Department released its report posting mom and pop America on its terror watch:
Despotism loves alarm.
From the Reichstag fire so useful to the Nazis, to 9/11, in which a blameless country was sacrificed on the altar of our passions, we see outrages hijacked and used for purposes squarely adverse to proper responses – pursuit of justice, revelation of truth. Instead, crimes and sensational events can be refabricated with frightening facility to become weapons themselves. In the dazed aftermath of an astonishing atrocity, amid raging fear and anger, it’s not difficult to whip up generalized frenzy and upheaval enough to install tyranny and assume control.
Oppression doesn’t march in, crushing freedom with heavy boot-heels. It comes riding to the rescue – banners unfurled and bugles blaring. It offers refuge in storms of confusion, it promises safety from further attack. It has a friendly face and velvet gloves. The minions who help shred constitutions, torture anyone suspect, and dissolve the rule of law, do so because they’re frightened, and because nothing can save them but order. In crises, they throw away everything they are – the better angels of their natures – because they are absolutely convinced it’s the right thing to do.
From recent events like the University of Virginia rape flameout, we know our betters are cushily insulated in moral delusion and brimming with hatred for us pale-male goy peasants. We are the blond savages of Sabrina Rubin Erdely’s horrendous imagination. We are all-purpose culprits in unreal culture resting on constant blame, ridicule, and demoralization.
In this context, idea of “white privilege” begins to make sense – at least, motivation for its concoction does. If one demographic of any society has special preogatives denied and in fact oppressing other population blocs, obvious remedy is to take away those privileges. “Ancillary” whites like Hispanics and Jews wouldn’t be targeted even though their individual social station might be higher (especially true of Jews); both groups have their own victim status in theory if doubtful reality. No… This “de-perking” would fall on heads of white Gentiles exclusively. Oddly, we are the “traditional” Americans conservatives have noted seem set for replacement by newly arrived if ad hoc “citizens” from the south.
Since no one can fully flesh out what constitutes “privilege” in this issue, we can be sure just about everything that makes life worth living would be targeted. Perhaps we’d have to pay special taxes. We’d be held to a higher standard of behavior, perhaps – maybe jaywalking while WASP would draw felony penalties. In many ways, this process already is in place. Our sterling if somewhat retarded and resentful Attorney General has declared white gentiles outside protection of “hate crime” laws; certainly, racial attacks on whites almost never draw these specious charges even when skin-tone factor is obvious. Gradually, in campaign driven mostly by media, academia, and foolishly self-hating whites, we are being relieved of any claim to humanity.
With a little pretext, our enemies could end our endless evil. …Forever.
- Dec. 19, 12:49 PST
~ O ~
“Taliban Fear Backlash After School Attack in Pakistan”
PESHAWAR (Roiders) – Taliban members and those in the Afghan emigre community voiced concerns that the recent attack on a school here – an atrocity that left almost 150 children dead – will provoke vengeful ‘backlash’ by Pakistanis. Already, there have been reports of name-calling and at least one person had one of those oddball burlap feedbags snatched from his head.
Yeah. It’s fake. Keep this up, maybe I can work for Rolling Stone.
Only white-gentile majority nations are singled out for the ‘backlash’ scourge. This courtesy is extended especially to Muslims, since Islam comprises the most murderous religion among us. Our media drown us in ‘backlash-fear’ bullshit every time Muslims slaughter infidels in their own countries.
On Monday, even before two hostages were killed by a rapist wife-killer – and cleric – Australian media went batshit over much-anticipated, never-seen ‘backlash’ by godless honkies against this community of vibrants imported to the West regardless they have criminal and extremist records in their shitholes of origin. “Sheikh” Haron was given asylum by Down Under folk in 2001. He should have been dumped in a hole and never let out, but our idiotic, pathological altruism blinds us to everything but concocted claims of phantom Klansmen under every fat-ass Lay-Z-Boy.
There, and in Auburn, in Bankstown, in Liverpool, and in Greenacre, the situation is the same; Sydney’s Muslims are anxious. They’re shocked by the allegations levelled against one of their own. They’re bracing for a backlash against innocent families. And they’re worried wider Australia will convict all Muslims of guilt by association.
And they braced and they braced and they braced. They must be dead tired (if, indeed, neo-Scripture allows use of ‘dead’ in this context) from all that bracing. No… ‘Braced’ doesn’t mean they sat in palapable tension while an orthodontist wired a car grille all up in they mouth. No. They were braced for violent reaction from reactionary white Australians. ….To anti-terror raids in that country late last summer. In that round of bracing, no pogroms occurred. No legions of unforgivably white Aussies rampaged through any Down Under casbahs, yanking towels off heads and torching mosques. No one died. There were very, very few incidents of beatings – but unconfirmed. …So the ass-kicking could have been someone punched by a loanshark and spinning the shiner into fashionable sob story. Can you argue that never happens? Really?
There were horrid if speciously ‘violent’ outbursts, however – at same level of ferocity as those tormenting the ‘Muslim community’ this week. Here’s partial roundup of outrages that burned their neighborhoods to the ground since September:
“In one case, a Western Sydney mother and her baby were spat on and her pram [baby carriage] kicked. In another, a man in Perth tried to rip the scarf off a woman’s head. Several mosques around the country have been threatened, egged, vandalized and a pig’s head impaled on a cross.”
According to that tale of woe, Muslims Down Under “felt” the backlast. And… sure… they did some more now-routine bracing. In fact, Muslims in Australia contorted themselves with all sorts of outrage-prep, waiting for pitchforks and bonfires. In the end, they did everything but actually suffer anything that could be construed by anyone with even half a brain as “backlash”. (Actually, that pig’s head on a cross sounds more anti-Christian than anti-raghead.)
I’ve gassed on about this “backlash meme” in Western media more than once in recent months. Every time some fanatic pulls what Daniel Pipes calls “instant jihad syndrome”, we are soaked to the gills in moronic conjecture about a coming “backlash” that never comes. The real story isn’t about dead Westerners; the real danger here is white Christian depredation against much-coddled, oddly prized “Muslim communities”. That, I suppose, is to debunk any doubts we might have that replacement-level immigration from the Third World will save our satanic selves with vibrant, hot ‘n spicy multiculturalism.
…Not that Australia’s immersion into tender sensibilities and colorful customs of new arrivals has been free of broken eggs. But this violence doesn’t spring from the “right” demographic according to our sellout media, so we almost NEVER hear about it. Here’s something from the outlaw press – not serious enough to need fabrication or outright lies to cover any ideological tracks:
The sudden appearance of MBM (Muslim Brotherhood Movement), with its growing membership recruited predominantly from the city’s south-western suburbs, has alarmed senior police already battling to combat open warfare among outlaw motorbike gangs. Even hardened private security guards have expressed concern to police about the indiscriminate “punch and run” tactics of MBM members who, in the past two weeks, have arrived in large numbers at city nightclub venues and who walk the streets in intimidating mobs. But the objectives of MBM – its emblem features two crossed pistols and a hand grenade – and its leadership remain unclear to officers of both the Organised Crime and Gang Squad and Middle Eastern Organised Crime Squad. [FrontPageMag]
How inopportune. We’re supposed to believe Muslims are angelic, progressive, generous, huggy-bears. …Not honky-hating Hell’s Angels. No wonder American Pravda ignores this news not fit to print. ‘Course, with the Internet, even we grimy little peasants can access what in days of yore passed for the truth. No WONDER there are so many calls to control “hate” in cyberspace, to censor the information superhighway. For our detached elites, “hate” is what we lowly call “fact”. (In this paragraph’s link, the referenced crime wave was at first ascribed to Lebanese “Christians” by our vicious, phony news prattlers.) One bright spot in this whole shitty process is that this Newsbusters story today topped Google search “muslim australia backlash”.
Before the hostage standoff with an Islamic gunman in Sydney had even ended on Monday, the media had already seized on a social media campaign that offered protection to Australian Muslims against imagined bigotry that had not occurred. On Good Morning America, co-host George Stephanopoulos touted: “The #IllRideWithYou trending worldwide on Twitter. It’s a message of tolerance from Sydney residents offering solidarity with Muslims in the cities. Locals concerned people in religious attire could be harassed.”… In the same 7 a.m. ET hour on CNN’s New Day, journalist Bobby Ghosh praised the effort as “a wonderful thing” and declared: “Australians are stepping up and saying, ‘If you’re a Muslim, if you want to wear religious clothing and you’re worried about going on public transport, I’ll ride with you’….It rejects the idea that Muslims cannot live in Australia or that Muslims should feel oppressed in Australia…”
Why would Muslims be afraid to ride public transportation or feel “oppressed” in Australia? Again, there were no incidents reported of any Muslim citizens being persecuted.
Good question. This “backlash” has been looong coming – and we’re still waiting. Here’s a weepy pile of crap from 2005 – crowding out updates on London’s horrendous transit bombings by fanatical… Baptists?
This outright spit-in-the-face slight to white victims in Monday’s Sydney savage hostage-taking is par for the course here in the West. It’s never interests of evil white people that are considered. It’s always care and feeding of “immigrants” – whether they be squatting in Western nations legally or not.
Our betters don’t want us to get any ideas we’re actually human, after all.
- Dec. 17, 2014, 13:06 PST